Incarnation vs Indwelling
(Ownership vs Joint Cohabitation)
By definition the incarnated body of an entity (a God) is not a joint cohabitation arrangement with any other spirit sharing that same body. Two spirits sharing the same body would describe a man that is possessed. An incarnated entity (a god) has sole ownership; this is the entity’s body alone.
The church has failed to address the “indwelling” of God’s Spirit in Jesus (that is Jesus being “indwelt” with, as in having the Spirit of God “dwell in you”; Jesus being possessed with or “filled with” God’s Spirit):
WRITTEN SOURCE(s): Merriam-Webster Dictionary
Possessed: Influenced or controlled by something (as a spirit, a passion, etc.)
BIBLE SOURCE: The word “possessed” is found in the scriptures with various examples.
The word possessed and (“dwell in you”) can be found in scripture as referring to the joint cohabitation of a spirit occupying a human body (Romans 8:9-11; 2 Corinthians 6:16, Mat 4:24, 8:16, 24, 33, 9:32, Mark 5:15-16, 18, Luke 8:36; Acts 16:16).
If you were to say “I received the Holy Ghost” or “I have the Holy Ghost” (God’s Spirit), which is not something normally given man at birth, it means you possess a spirit, it being the Holy Spirit of God (in some manner or portion).
All men have their own personal God given spirit (for life) (Numbers 16:22; 27:16; Job 32:8; 1 Corinthians 6:20; Ecclesiastes 12:7, etc.) but can receive God’s Holy Spirit (called Holy Ghost) indwelling them at the same time (1 Corinthians 3:16; 1 Thessalonians 4:8). What specific portion of God’s spirit dwells in man is determined by God, but we certainly do not literally consume or confine all of God himself within the limited confines of the human body. God is not controlling humans as robots (although he could) but his Spirit influences our mind, heals our bodies, gives us spiritual gifts, etc. (1 Corinthians 12:4,11; 2 Peter 1:20,21) We as humans have independent free will to obey and serve God as did Jesus. Unlike man’s indwelling Spirit of God, an incarnation is claimed to be the visible flesh covering or body, which solely belongs to the entity (a god) alone.
However if we say God actually incarnated himself and if it were true then by definition, God would not cease being God. The only change would be that of his appearance, God had become material. God became a visible God, a God that went around literally talking and walking with men in his fleshly state while he retained all of his other Godly attributes, he still had, “all knowledge” and “all power”, not just part of God had it, (unless God now has parts).
According to the Bible:
Jesus said All power was given him, The Son can do nothing of himself and that his Father was greater than he was (Matthew 28:18, John 5:19, 10:29 and 14:28) This cannot be if Jesus is literally the manifest Eternal Spirit of God the Father himself speaking here. Either he was telling the truth or he was lying about his power and its source, if they were literally one and the same.
No man has seen God at anytime or heard his voice, both occurred with Jesus.
It is obvious from Scripture that Jesus did not know everything, for he grew in wisdom (Luke 2:52). Jesus said that ONLY His Father knew the day of the second coming, not the Son (Matthew 24:36, Mark 13:32). Again, either he was telling the truth or he was lying about his knowledge, if as we say, they are one and the same. If Jesus was telling the truth, clearly they are not the same.
If the above incarnation definition is correct, then by our current definition we make God out to be either a deceiver, when Jesus told his disciples many mansions were “in my Father’s house” instead of his house. Or in many other verses a liar when Jesus claims to be someone else (the Son of God), instead of who he truly was, God himself.
- We also cite (Colossians 1:15) “Who is the image of the invisible God” in support of our incarnation claim. If something is truly invisible, the only way you can be the image of anything invisible is figuratively speaking, by reflecting its character, not its physical make-up.
- If one thing is the “image” of another thing, then the “image” and the “original” are not the same thing. When you look at someone standing in front of a mirror you see a reflection of their image. The Father is called “God” in many verses, and that is why there is no verse that calls the Father the image of God.
- Just as Jesus is called the image of God, we also are called the image of God. (1 Corinthians 11:7) says, “A man ought not to cover his head, since he is the image and glory of God.”
Words in the Bible must be read and understood in their common or ordinary meaning unless good reason can be given to alter that meaning. In this case, the common meaning of “image” is “likeness” or “resemblance,” and it is used that way every time in the New Testament.